Clear was publicly advertised by a past contractor.CryptoA blocked a LLC on social media Delaware Chancery Court to share sensitive information online regarding the crypto-company.
However, Vice Chancellor Nathan CookThe court will make the judgement ThursdayHe declared he wasn’t going to make an order Bradley Cain To stop posting any damaging content about the firm. This may lead to more issues. Delaware Courtroom for you to consider.
“The imposition of injunctions with respect to that potentially raises speech issues,” He stated. “To the extent that those concerns regarding derogatory comments can escalate into defamation claims, that’s the kind of thing my colleagues in the High Court would traditionally handle.”
CainThe following is a list of SenecaSC did not answer to the lawsuit. October By Puerto RicoClear -basedCryptos and its mother/father company, news agency SiriusIQ Mobile LLC. Cook You had ordered Cain To appear in a Wilmington, DelCourtroom to explain why a default judgement should not be entered against him.
Cain They didn’t appear in courtroom Thursday He didn’t respond immediately to an email requesting a comment. No His representative was the lawyer listed in the court record.
The Chancery Decree changed the suggested order of default judgment for businesses, with flashy language to stop Cain You can also post more “disparaging statements” on-line.
Controversial Accounts
Cain was employed in May 2022 “for the purpose of having Cain sponsor and promote ClearCryptos,” According to the complaint, it had been creating its own cryptocurrency token. He He was compensated for two months of work. Nonetheless, his independent contractor contract was “terminated for cause” It ended earlier than expected Aug. 25, 2022, he said.
Once The companies asked that he stop posting information about them online. Cain Lawyer for the companies said that he responded with an obscene message, which made it clear that he would not cease. William Alleman Of Meluney Alleman & Spence LLC.
Details More Cain’s Online postings were far away from the complaint and weren’t mentioned in court.
Cain The offensive was eventually dropped Twitter Although YouTube videos and accounts were mentioned in the complaint, the new social media profiles have continued to post offensive content alleging that companies are. “scammers” Clear has launched the token not too long ago.CryptoIt is a scam. Alleman said.
Cain’s The new accounts have not been authenticated and the owners usually don’t reveal sensitive information about their companies. “but we are concerned that he has more and may post more if he feels free to,” Alleman said.
Though Cain You may have even created new social media accounts. “it appears that the spread of sensitive information has slowed or ceased,” Cook said.
“The grant of injunctive relief as to not divulge any more confidential information, or to remove confidential information, provides the key relief for the plaintiffs here,” He said.
Cook Additional orders Cain To pay $39,000 in attorney’s fees for the business.
The SiriusIQ is the case Mobile LLC v. Cain, Del. Ch., No. 2022-0918. Hearing 1/26/23.
